A Word About Bologna
That said . . . this post is about organic characterization. There is a tendency for some authors to pile quirks on top of quirks or to add these oddball details about a character. But WHY is always my first question. If psychologists can trace bologna-phobia to a meal-time trauma, so must EVERY trait or quirk be explained in some fashion--even if the details never make your book . . . the back story has to be there to have an organic sense of character.
In Double Down, for instance, Skye is a gambling addict. Now, this makes perfect sense--her dad is a bookie. But in truth, it goes much deeper than that, and she talks, at one point, about an incident in her childhood involving the empty places where her dad used to hide his illegal flash paper (something used, way back when, to write your gambling "books" on--you could set it on fire in a "flash" or drop it in the toilet and watch it melt away instantly in water--all the better for a police raid--don't ask me how I know all this . . . or I'd have to kill you). She gambled because of empty places that nothing but gambling filled--she gambled as a motherless daughter, missing the woman who was snatched from her life, to fill that hole. I did NOT as author wake up one morning and think, "Oh, what the hell, I'll make her a compulsive gambler." The thread of that compulsion had to run all the way back almost to birth. To the empty place.
So . . . this is a word about bologna. And a word about organic character traits. It's all, in my opinion, about threads you can trace, not traits IMPOSED.
Thoughts? And any bologna tales of your own?



