Intuitive
There are a lot of things I do in my life that I have no idea how or why. I just do. Mom things, for example. My kids can come to me time and time and time again with stomach aches, for example. I feel foreheads, press bellies, ask questions, and 99% of the time say, "You'll be fine; it's something you ate." But that 1% when they come to me and I know, I mean REALLY KNOW "something" is wrong, you would think I was the chief of surgery on E.R. I fly into action and just "know" what to do, who to call, etc. Some of this, of course, is the result of years of mothering, or years of reading up on ailments when someone in my family is sick. It's having Crohn's disease and thus knowing a lot about "gut" ailments. And some is intuitive.
Yesterday, for example, I saw a babysitter trying to console a 7-week-old baby. She changed him, he didn't stop crying. I knew he was hungry--it was that kind of wail--and his mom fed him and handed him back to the babysitter. And the baby kept crying. Baby Girl asked about it, and I said, "He needs to be held differently; that's not a Mama Hold." Which I was quite certain was true. Most of the time I can get any baby to sleep. The secret is to project calm and not get ruffled, and the secret to THAT is intuitive.
So it is with writing. I had sold--not kidding--four novels before I ever saw the following three letters on a writers' board: GMC. I thought it was some movie channel akin to AMC. In fact, I didn't bother to look it up or even ask. I sold another two books before I found out they mean "Goal, Motivation, Conflict" and it came from some workshop.
When I write a book, I think in arcs. If you ASKED me, I mean probingly asked, I might be able to tell you, "Character A starts out this way. By the end she has changed to that way." But I really don't ever consciously think of that. It's a journey, and I just tell my story. I pour out the story until it's complete.
Now, really? I wouldn't HAVE this blog if I honestly didn't know anything about process or characters or themes or symbolism. But when it comes to telling my story, I FEEL it more than I explain it. I intuit it.
I have writer friends who are the opposite. They use GMC models and worksheets. They devise all sorts of outlines and character sketch interviews (they really interview their characters!). And it's always whatever works. I just can't work that way. But I am curious . . . what devices do YOU use?
Discuss. :-)
Yesterday, for example, I saw a babysitter trying to console a 7-week-old baby. She changed him, he didn't stop crying. I knew he was hungry--it was that kind of wail--and his mom fed him and handed him back to the babysitter. And the baby kept crying. Baby Girl asked about it, and I said, "He needs to be held differently; that's not a Mama Hold." Which I was quite certain was true. Most of the time I can get any baby to sleep. The secret is to project calm and not get ruffled, and the secret to THAT is intuitive.
So it is with writing. I had sold--not kidding--four novels before I ever saw the following three letters on a writers' board: GMC. I thought it was some movie channel akin to AMC. In fact, I didn't bother to look it up or even ask. I sold another two books before I found out they mean "Goal, Motivation, Conflict" and it came from some workshop.
When I write a book, I think in arcs. If you ASKED me, I mean probingly asked, I might be able to tell you, "Character A starts out this way. By the end she has changed to that way." But I really don't ever consciously think of that. It's a journey, and I just tell my story. I pour out the story until it's complete.
Now, really? I wouldn't HAVE this blog if I honestly didn't know anything about process or characters or themes or symbolism. But when it comes to telling my story, I FEEL it more than I explain it. I intuit it.
I have writer friends who are the opposite. They use GMC models and worksheets. They devise all sorts of outlines and character sketch interviews (they really interview their characters!). And it's always whatever works. I just can't work that way. But I am curious . . . what devices do YOU use?
Discuss. :-)
Labels: GMC


28 Comments:
This is complicated, but I think you and I are in the same (perhaps leaky) boat.
When I'm actually writing, I'm not really thinking too much about all the logical, rational things I actually DO know about what makes up a good story. Yes, I might actually conceptualize that, yes, the main character needs to be pro-active and not have things happen to them. I'm aware intuitively when there might be a problem with the pace, but I use my knowledge of technique to realize there are X number of ways to solve that problem and I sift through them to find what I hope is the best one.
When I sit down to write my blog about writing, I do actually realize that I have a conscious, intellectual grasp of most of the techniques necessary to make good fiction. But when I'm actually writing, I'm mostly in the story, I'm mostly the main character or the POV character. I've internalized most of the techniques. I don't say, "Okay, let's count how many times I used an adverb."
But I've also sort of trained myself over the years to try and get it right the first time through. My rough drafts are pretty good. They need work, they're rough, but "IT" is mostly there. And that comes from practice, practice, practice.
One of my beta readers commented that he'd recently read a manuscript by an aspiring novelist and although the idea was good and the line by line writing was okay, the guy just didn't understand story structure. And the compliment he gave me was that it was obvious I did.
Well, some people are born with it, but the rest of us read a few million books, read a lot of books about writing, and more importantly, wrote and wrote and wrote.
I think it's okay if your intuition is informed by experience and knowledge, after all. :)
I'm writing a novel for the first time. Everything I've written and published are essays and opinion pieces and articles. And I've been successful with that.
But with novel writing my instincts are non-existent! I am constantly visualizing my character and story arcs, to make sure the key elements are present. Is chapter 15 (my chapter from hell that is making me crazeeee) consistent with where my MC has come so far?
My intuition comes into play when I allow myself to remember...to know...that I can write, even when I think I can't. That my story has entertained and interested my beta readers, and it's a matter of tweaking this new craft of mine.
I have to listen to my instincts and intuition. When I do not, I'm always sorry.
I've tried interviewing my characters. It lasts about 2 minutes. Then I have to write.
I like the way you put it, Erica. That you FEEL the story. If I'm not writing from that feeling place, then it just doesn't work.
Oh, Erica. You have hit on a subject that ruffled me when I first heard it - the GMC. Like you, I was so completely clueless (why everyone insists on throwing around call letters is beyond me - right up there with OMG!) Anyway, I once belonged to a local romance chapter and we did a mock agent presentation in preparation for an upcoming NJRWA conference. I had scheduled appointements with three agents, so I wanted to be ready.
There I was with my blurb in front of me. I read it off and the "mock" agent at first said, "Wow!" and then she said, "But what's the GMC?" I had no clue. Thereafter she hammered me, saying the I HAD TO KNOW from start to finish, what the GMC was.
Okay, so this is getting long winded, the point is that I have since found that playing by some contrived writing guidelines such as "Gotta know GMC from start to finish" doesn't work with me. Like you and Mark, I know my stories, motif/theme, and I rely on my intuition to get it in the right place.
P.S. I've since let my RWA membership lapse, not because of the GMC, but that it stopped being a good fit for me.
Hi Mark:
I agree. We process all that knowledge into what then becomes second nature, perhaps?
E
Hi Amy:
Donna Hayes (CEO, Harlequin) once did an interview in which she was photographed next to my cover of Spanish Disco with a line "Our novels are not formulaic" (or something like that) . . . anyway, people like to think you can write a romance as A + B = C and voila. But that feels stale. So yes, I think you have to go with the gut.
kath:
I really dislike when people make writers feel like there's only "one" way to do it. I do think a writer needs to perfect his or her pitch, but I have NEVER, in my life, had an editor ask me about GMC. Ever.
E
Liz:
I can't interview them either!!!
E
I'm totally a feeler. If I read about a technique, I have to process it away from the story and let it settle into my subconscious. I can't use a manufactured technique in a story... it feels too wooden.
Besides, a whole lot of a story is timing, pacing and flow. I can't plan that; I have to feel it. Sometimes I've read a story to critique, and all I can think is like, a beat is missing here.
I have that intuition about understanding kids and their motivations, fears, and issues.
We certainly don't want cookie-cutter novels, but Goal-Motivation-Conflict pretty much has to be there for Story to be there. Doesn't it?
I approach it intuitively as well, but I think GMC is a solid model for showing how drama works.
Intuition, totally. Like you, I didn't know what a GMC was until fairly recently. I don't like under the hood much, I just drive.
spy:
I'm a Feeler on most personality charts.
E
Jude:
Maybe. But it's a chicken/egg thing.
And I cannot imagine an editor asking what's your GMC, lije Kath said. There must be a hundred ways to think of it--the Hero's Journey, for example. Or whatever works for the writer, without boxing it into a technique.
E
Alyson:
LOL! That's a neat way to think of it! I don't look under my hood much either.
E
Erica:
Definitely a chicken/egg thing.
While I can't imagine an editor actually using the term GMC, I'm sure the slush piles are full of manuscripts lacking sufficient conflict and tension, and/or with characters whose goals and motivations are not clearly enough defined. So I think GMC is a nice simple tool for those us trying to break in, a good point to consider while working through drafts.
I don't even think of it as a technique, really. More of a reminder to keep the tension taut and the characterization consistent.
I try to plot and arc as much of the characters and the story as I can, so I have an idea what is going to happen, to whom, and by when in the story. That way I can stop trying to "get it right" and just let the story develop, let the characters grow, inside of the sandbox I have set them in.
I feel like that works best for me... at least I feel less confused about the story as I write it. Although there are a few times in each story that I do get completely blind-sided by something I did not expect. Makes it more fun that way.
Erica, thanks for the GMC reassurance. For a bit I thought it was just me, a girl who believes that the "GMC" unfolds without my knowledge. ;)
ewoh:
I love getting blindsided every once in a while. It reminds me of how the process is so much more than what a book or "how to" on writing can ever tell you.
E
kath:
It's not just you. :-)
E
Jude:
I hear you. I've always been a "what works for you."
E
I don't set up a character to grow out of their original shell or persona. As they proceed through their various conflicts and are able to resolve those conflicts, then they grow. Its not a consciousness thought for me.
While writing I sometimes get a burst of an idea that if I make this particular character act in a way that is different than their usual routine, then I have an "ah ha" moment and realize that this character is growing through his or her actions. This in turn opens up further avenues of conflict and resolution movements.
I'm so glad there are many of you who write intuitively like me. I have read all the articles about how to write, including GMCs etc. but I break out in a sweat while reading them and can't breath. Analysing the creative process kills the creativity - at least for me. And gives me a panic attack.
Interviewing my characters doesnt' work for me. I've tried.
Usually the story just pulls me along on its own. If I look back do I see that people have um..grown? Yeah, I think so.
And I think I'm still learning.
Barbara:
Your description of your process--VERY much like mine. Those "Ah ha" moments when writing . . . I adore when that happens!
Suzanne:
LOL! Me, too.
E
Hi Aimless:
As I said . . . the tools can work for some people, but for others, I guess it feels like imposing something rigid on their work or it feels . . . strange or stifling in some way.
E
GMC *shudder* All those boxes give me hives!
仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 托盘|钢托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 周转箱|塑料周转箱 托盘|纸托盘 料箱|钢制料箱 工具柜|工具车|抽屉柜 工作台|工作桌 刀具柜|刀具车|刀具架 手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车|手动叉车 仓储笼 仓库笼 南京仓储笼 常州仓储笼 无锡仓储笼 苏州仓储笼 徐州仓储笼 南通仓储笼 镇江仓储笼 连云港仓储笼 泰州仓储笼 扬州仓储笼 盐城仓储笼 淮安仓储笼 宿迁仓储笼 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 托盘|钢托盘|堆垛架 钢制料箱|物流台车|手推车 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 堆垛架|巧固架 钢制料箱 物流台车|载物台车 手推车 手推车 轻量型货架|角钢货架 中量A型货架 中量B型货架 货位式货架 横梁式货架 阁楼式货架|钢平台 悬臂式货架 贯通式货架|通廊式货架|驶入式货架 辊轮式货架|流利条货架 压入式货架 移动式货架|密集架 模具货架 抽屉式货架 汽车4S店货架 汽配库货架 自动化立体仓库货架 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 手推车|铁板手推车 手推车|静音手推车 置物架|工业置物架|家用置物架 堆垛架|巧固架 挂板架|物料整理架 登高车 物流台车|载物台车 料箱|钢制料箱 搬运车|手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 堆高机|堆垛机|手动堆高机|电动堆高机 叉车|电动叉车|内燃叉车|叉车厂 轻型货架|角钢货架 中型货架|次重型货架 重型货架|横梁式货架|托盘式货架 贯通式货架|通廊式货架 阁楼货架|钢平台 精品货架|展示货架 悬臂式货架 抽屉式货架|模具货架 辊轮式货架|流利式货架 移动式货架|密集架 网片|隔离网|护栏 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 置物柜|置物架 挂板架|物料整理架 单挂钩|直挂钩|螺丝刀架|扳手架 工作台|工作桌 线棒货架 输送辊道|辊道输送机 不锈钢制品|不锈钢推车 仓储笼|钢托盘|塑料托盘 钢制料箱|物流台车|堆垛架 静音手推车|登高车 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动堆高车|平台车 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储货架|仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|横梁式货架|中型货架 钢托盘|塑料托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 钢制料箱|工具柜|工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架> 仓储货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 托盘|塑料托盘|钢制托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 托盘|塑料托盘|钢制托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|折叠式仓储笼|仓库笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓储货架|仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|中型货架|横梁式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|塑料托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 钢制料箱|工具柜|工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|铁托盘|栈板 托盘|塑料托盘|栈板 纸托盘|栈板 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 钢制料箱|钢制周转箱|网格式料箱 搬运车|手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|铁托盘|栈板 塑料托盘|塑料栈板 纸托盘|栈板 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 钢制料箱|钢质周转箱|网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|液压搬运车 仓储货架|>仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|中型货架|横梁式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|塑料托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 钢制料箱|工具柜|工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|铁托盘|栈板 塑料托盘|塑料栈板 纸托盘|栈板 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 钢制料箱|钢质周转箱|网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|托盘搬运车 货架|仓储货架|仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|上海货架|北京货架 轻型货架|中型货架|搁板式货架 重型货架|横梁式货架|托盘式货架 托盘|木托盘|纸托盘|木塑托盘 托盘|钢托盘|塑料托盘|钢制托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 手推车|静音手推车|铁板手推车 物料架|整理架|挂板架 料箱|钢制料箱|钢制周转箱|网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车|半电动堆高车|手动叉车 塑料周转箱|物流箱|塑料化工桶|塑料卡板箱 工具柜|上海工具柜|南京工具柜|抽屉柜 工作台|工作桌|南京工作台|上海工作台 刀具车|刀具柜|刀具架|刀具座 货架 货架厂 货架公司 仓储货架 仓库货架 库房货架 南京货架 上海货架 托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 货架|轻量型货架|角钢货架 货架|中量型货架|次重型货架 货位式货架|横梁式货架|重量型货架 仓储货架|阁楼式货架|钢平台 仓储货架|悬臂式货架 仓储货架|贯通式货架|通廊式货架|驶入式货架 仓库货架|库房货架|抽屉式货架|模具货架 仓库货架|库房货架|汽车4S店货架|汽配库货架 货架厂|货架公司|南京货架|上海货架|无锡货架|苏州货架 货架厂|货架公司|北京货架|天津货架|沈阳货架|大连货架 货架厂|货架公司|广州货架|深圳货架|杭州货架 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 置物架|多功能置物架|卫浴置物架 料箱|钢制料箱|钢制周转箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|不锈钢托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车|半电动堆高车|电动堆高车|堆垛车 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 托盘 塑料托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 铁托盘 货架厂 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 南京货架 货架公司 货架厂 仓库货架 仓储货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架 货架厂 货架公司 南京货架 上海货架 托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 木托盘 南京托盘 南京钢托盘 上海托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 钢制料箱 手推车 静音手推车 平板手推车 登高车 物流台车 载物台车 置物架 堆垛架 巧固架 挂板架 物料整理架 手动液压托盘搬运车 叉车 登高车 堆垛车 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架公司 南京货架 上海货架 杭州货架 北京货架 托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 木托盘 纸托盘 南京托盘 南京钢制托盘 南京钢托盘 上海托盘 北京托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 钢制料箱 手推车 静音手推车 平板手推车 登高车 物流台车 置物架 堆垛架 巧固架 物料整理架 手动液压托盘搬运车 叉车 堆高车 堆垛车
Post a Comment
<< Home