Sunday, July 27, 2008

The Short List

Last night, all four of my kids and I happened to stumble on The Parent Trap remake with Lindsay Lohan on TV and decided to watch it together. Admittedly, parts of the movie are cute, and the performances good. I like Dennis Quaid a lot, and I enjoy Natasha Richardson (she was wonderful in Asylum). But I said to my daughter, "At the end of the day, I just can't get past the fact that these two pathetic parents each didn't SEE or lay eyes on the other twin for 12 years." They split up a pair of twins with nary a word, and everyone seemed to think this was a find custody arrangement. Yeah, it's a movie. But . . . seriously?

So it is with some elements in books or movies. I think every person has a short list of "things I just can't read about/see/or get past in a plot or character." I know a lot of people, for instance, who just can't get past vampires drinking blood, and so all efforts to make them sex symbols just don't work.

I won't watch "torture porn"--those movies that seem to exist purely for sicker and sicker ways to kill people, particularly women. I won't read torture porn, or books whose sole "grab you" hook is about torturing and humiliating a victim. Somehow the writing, the art, the characters seem to be lost in favor of shocking our American nearly-numb senses by making death even that more outlandish. It's not that I don't think those kinds of books can be done, or done well. I don't believe in censorship. I'm not a literary snob. It's just on my short list of "not going there."

I accidentally read an erotic novel (staying at someone's house, insomnia, grabbed something from the shelf, was halfway through before I realized where it was going) in which the romantic lead was the heroine's father, as in they embarked on an affair. Like that was supposed to be sexy? And this wasn't some sleaz-oid publishing house. The cover was gorgeous, and like I said, I was halfway through a pretty sexy novel before I had my "oh my God, I think I want to vomit" discovery of the big twist. On the flip side, I loved The Ballad of Jack and Rose because it had more complexity to the issues and his utopian ideal. Still . . . .

So . . . no-go on The Parent Trap for me. But what makes YOUR short list of no-can-do?

Labels:

23 Comments:

Anonymous Amy Nathan said...

I can't read books about children getting lost, away from their parents. There was a very popular book about that some years back. I'm just not interested. I also have a hard time understand how that is an appealing read for any mother. I can't get past transferring the situation to my own life.

I don't read traditional romance novels because I don't like women being saved by men -- and end up disappointed when I feel misled into reading a book that doesn't seem to be a category romance and ends up to be. I don't mind romance in a novel, I love it actually, and I loves me a chick flick more than chocolate, but there have to be other elements at play.

I recently read a book with so much potential (to me). It started with a strong main character who was surrounded by interesting and somewhat developed secondary characters, subplot and a bit of intrigue and romance. Then when the man took center stage, the main character was so relieved. The subplot went out the window, as did some complex plotlines about the main secondary character. I thought the book was going one place and it went some place else. And I didn't like the some place else.

My short list I suppose, is rather long.

9:43 AM, July 27, 2008  
Anonymous LaDonna said...

Hey Erica, have to agree with your short list and Amy's. The children in danger especially. I always put myself there, and it haunts me. Don't read the torture porn either. Just sick.

I love strong women characters too. I remember reading the old Harlequins, and the man rescued the damsel all the time. Nice that women have changed in life and books over the years.

And I love the older Parent Trap better, probably cause some remakes aren't always better. But you're absolutely right about the separation thing. Hard to believe.

11:20 AM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Sarah Laurenson said...

I know a woman whose father thought that each of the parents taking one kid and going off in their own direction was the fair and equitable thing to do. Same idea as divvying up the rest of the assests. It does take all kinds in life.

And in books, too. My reading habits and my movie watching habits changed over the years. And they diverged. I used to enjoy "action" movies that had a lot of violence. Not any more. But my favorite sub-genre in reading is military space opera, if the MC is a woman who kicks ass.

I like stories of powerful women and girls. Anything else has to have some very strong redeeming qualities.

12:14 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

Hi Amy:
Since I would never in a zillion years read something like that . . . I forgot to put it on my list, but yes! I don't know the appeal. A Mitchard book had that as the plot line, and then they made a movie with Michelle Pfieffer based on it . . . I didn't read it, and I didn't see it. I could "see," I guess how thematically it could work on many levels. But anyone who has ever even lost their kid for a second in a grocery store . . . I . . . just can't go there.

Demon Baby played the "hide and seek" think in Target two weeks ago. He got SO far away from me, and was adept at hiding behind end caps so when I looked down the aisle I couldn't see him. I was so terrified. Though I couldn't help but think anyone who snatched him would promptly give him back.

E

12:27 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

ladonna:
I don't generally read romance, and I definitely can't do the "rescue" thing.
E

12:27 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

Sarah:
My tastes have evolved and changed, too. I used to like a good four-hankie weeper once in a while. Now, I never do. I think because I've wept enough in real life and don't want to for entertainment. But yeah, my "short list" now is probably different from my list years ago.
E

12:30 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger spyscribbler said...

Lolita. While I'll admit the opening line is seductive and brilliant, just the idea of it makes me want to puke.

In erotica, the endless justifications for kink. I mean, gawd, ENDLESS. Yes, we know it's consensual already. And the ten-page long barely-disguised reassurances that it's okay to be kinky. EXHAUSTING. Can't we just have a good fantasy, no justifications or reassurances? Can't we just go with it?

12:54 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Mark Terry said...

I have the same issues with The Parent Trap, actually.

I have problems with any abuse of children in fiction. There's a way of handling violence and such in fiction that I don't mind and a way of handling it that I don't. It seems to be more of an attitude on the part of the writer, I think. Sometimes you can just tell the writer is making things gory and explicit to elicit a gross-out reaction from the reader, rather than having it actually be an organic part of the fiction. (And yes, I'm thinking a couple specific writers here). I don't mind straight detail about forensics or corpses, but when you get a POV of the serial killer actually torturing their victims, I start to have a lot of problems with it. (Again, several authors come to mind).

That said, I had a fair amount of torture scenes of one type or another in The Devil's Pitchfork and I can only hope I handled it in a way that was intended to show the intentions of the people involved and didn't glorify the behavior.

1:36 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

Spy:
Oldest is reading Lolita right now. I'm surprised she picked it up . . . but I'll see what she thinks (she reads mostly classics).
E

1:57 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

Mark:
I had child abuse in The Roofer . . . but it's 99% "off-stage" and I think it's utterly organic. But there are a few books and authors coming to mind where, and I hate to assume, but it seems like it's for shock value and not about being an advocate for children or about treating the idea with the respect it deserves.
E

1:58 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Edie said...

You've all hit my hot buttons. One more is an ending with no hope. It doesn't have to be a happy ending, but if it has no hope, I'm angry. That's why I hated The Departed with Jack Nicholson and Leo Decaprio.

5:02 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Jude Hardin said...

I'm having some plausibility issues with a certain NYT bestseller right now. Why does the hero get involved in the first place? Why don't the bad guys just shoot him? The suspension of disbelief is over-the-top, for me.

Then again, this guy sells a lot of books. Maybe that's the kind of thing I need to emulate to get my seven-figure advance...

5:11 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger The Anti-Wife said...

Totally agree with your short list and anything with abuse and actions that are wholly sensational and unnecessary. I often think they're signs of writers with otherwise limited story telling abilities.

7:18 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

edie:
I was kind of . . . stunned by the ending of The Departed. But, I guess, because of how the movie had been all along, I reached a point where I knew it was just going to be a hopeless mess--like Scarface.

10:10 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

Jude:
I guess sometimes the writing/pacing just suspends disbelief for some. Also, as I have said before, I think when WE as writers read something, we have different expectations than average readers.
E

10:11 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

anti-wife:
Yes. Agree totally.
E

10:11 PM, July 27, 2008  
Anonymous Carson Beck said...

I don't hate chick lit. But I just can't read the ones where the youngish twenty something goes off to the city and finds love or independence or shoes or anything really. I'm a twenty something and i always feel short changed when reading about characters my age. They are dumber or happier or sadder than anyone person should be, instead of being well rounded my experience has been that they have one quality that outshines the rest of them.

The only other thing that irks me is endings, the down side to this one of course is i don't know the ending will be bad until the book is over. But there is definitely a smaller chance i'll pick up the next book by that author if the ending isn't story appropriate.

10:49 PM, July 27, 2008  
Blogger Zoe Winters said...

I'm with you on the torture porn thing. I like my torture a little more psychological and a little less amputated, thanks. And on the daddy thing. Eww. That squicks me even when people do it in a sexual situation where they aren't actually related. I can't read erotica when the term "daddy" is bandied about at ALL. Serious squick factor. I mean, the word "daddy" clearly makes you think of your father, and my dad is the LAST thing I want to think about when reading erotica or engaging in sex. Just...yuck!

But I guess there is an audience for that. People tend to be very particular about what they read in that genre.

7:59 AM, July 28, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

Hi Carson:
As I have confessed here on my blog, I often read the last page to be sure I will like an ending.
E

9:14 AM, July 28, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

zoe:
It wouldn't have been this hardcover book from a major publisher if it wasn't a niche, I guess. But gross.

E

9:15 AM, July 28, 2008  
Blogger Zoe Winters said...

Was it St. Martin's press? I've noticed they tend to put out edgier things.

10:48 AM, July 28, 2008  
Blogger Erica Orloff said...

Zoe:
YES! LOL!!!!!!

And THEN . . . I was staying with my sister one time, and I picked up an erotica from St. martin's that she got at a garage sale . . . and in THAT one, this woman was controlled by her cousin or something, and he had her nursing a sheep (I kid you not). I was like . . . "Okay. . . . I am trying to be open-minded? But REALLY? THIS is sexy kink?"--and again, St. Martin's . . . hardcover.
E

11:27 AM, July 28, 2008  
Blogger peter.w said...

仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 托盘|钢托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 周转箱|塑料周转箱 托盘|纸托盘 料箱|钢制料箱 工具柜|工具车|抽屉柜 工作台|工作桌 刀具柜|刀具车|刀具架 手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车|手动叉车 仓储笼 仓库笼 南京仓储笼 常州仓储笼 无锡仓储笼 苏州仓储笼 徐州仓储笼 南通仓储笼 镇江仓储笼 连云港仓储笼 泰州仓储笼 扬州仓储笼 盐城仓储笼 淮安仓储笼 宿迁仓储笼 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 托盘|钢托盘|堆垛架 钢制料箱|物流台车|手推车 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 堆垛架|巧固架 钢制料箱 物流台车|载物台车 手推车 手推车 轻量型货架|角钢货架 中量A型货架 中量B型货架 货位式货架 横梁式货架 阁楼式货架|钢平台 悬臂式货架 贯通式货架|通廊式货架|驶入式货架 辊轮式货架|流利条货架 压入式货架 移动式货架|密集架 模具货架 抽屉式货架 汽车4S店货架 汽配库货架 自动化立体仓库货架 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 手推车|铁板手推车 手推车|静音手推车 置物架|工业置物架|家用置物架 堆垛架|巧固架 挂板架|物料整理架 登高车 物流台车|载物台车 料箱|钢制料箱 搬运车|手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 堆高机|堆垛机|手动堆高机|电动堆高机 叉车|电动叉车|内燃叉车|叉车厂 轻型货架|角钢货架 中型货架|次重型货架 重型货架|横梁式货架|托盘式货架 贯通式货架|通廊式货架 阁楼货架|钢平台 精品货架|展示货架 悬臂式货架 抽屉式货架|模具货架 辊轮式货架|流利式货架 移动式货架|密集架 网片|隔离网|护栏 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 置物柜|置物架 挂板架|物料整理架 单挂钩|直挂钩|螺丝刀架|扳手架 工作台|工作桌 线棒货架 输送辊道|辊道输送机 不锈钢制品|不锈钢推车 仓储笼|钢托盘|塑料托盘 钢制料箱|物流台车|堆垛架 静音手推车|登高车 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动堆高车|平台车 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 仓储货架|仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|横梁式货架|中型货架 钢托盘|塑料托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 钢制料箱|工具柜|工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架> 仓储货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 托盘|塑料托盘|钢制托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 托盘|塑料托盘|钢制托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|折叠式仓储笼|仓库笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓储货架|仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|中型货架|横梁式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|塑料托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 钢制料箱|工具柜|工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|铁托盘|栈板 托盘|塑料托盘|栈板 纸托盘|栈板 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 钢制料箱|钢制周转箱|网格式料箱 搬运车|手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|铁托盘|栈板 塑料托盘|塑料栈板 纸托盘|栈板 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 钢制料箱|钢质周转箱|网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|液压搬运车 仓储货架|>仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|中型货架|横梁式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|塑料托盘|纸托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 钢制料箱|工具柜|工作台 手动液压托盘搬运车|手动液压堆高车 仓库货架|中量A型货架 仓储货架|中量B型货架 库房货架|横梁式货架|货位式货架 钢托盘|钢制托盘|铁托盘|栈板 塑料托盘|塑料栈板 纸托盘|栈板 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼|蝴蝶笼|储物笼 钢制料箱|钢质周转箱|网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|托盘搬运车 货架|仓储货架|仓库货架|库房货架 南京货架|上海货架|北京货架 轻型货架|中型货架|搁板式货架 重型货架|横梁式货架|托盘式货架 托盘|木托盘|纸托盘|木塑托盘 托盘|钢托盘|塑料托盘|钢制托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 手推车|静音手推车|铁板手推车 物料架|整理架|挂板架 料箱|钢制料箱|钢制周转箱|网格式料箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车|半电动堆高车|手动叉车 塑料周转箱|物流箱|塑料化工桶|塑料卡板箱 工具柜|上海工具柜|南京工具柜|抽屉柜 工作台|工作桌|南京工作台|上海工作台 刀具车|刀具柜|刀具架|刀具座 货架 货架厂 货架公司 仓储货架 仓库货架 库房货架 南京货架 上海货架 托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 货架|轻量型货架|角钢货架 货架|中量型货架|次重型货架 货位式货架|横梁式货架|重量型货架 仓储货架|阁楼式货架|钢平台 仓储货架|悬臂式货架 仓储货架|贯通式货架|通廊式货架|驶入式货架 仓库货架|库房货架|抽屉式货架|模具货架 仓库货架|库房货架|汽车4S店货架|汽配库货架 货架厂|货架公司|南京货架|上海货架|无锡货架|苏州货架 货架厂|货架公司|北京货架|天津货架|沈阳货架|大连货架 货架厂|货架公司|广州货架|深圳货架|杭州货架 托盘|钢托盘|钢制托盘 托盘|塑料托盘 仓储笼|仓库笼|折叠式仓储笼 置物架|多功能置物架|卫浴置物架 料箱|钢制料箱|钢制周转箱 手动液压托盘搬运车|不锈钢托盘搬运车|电动托盘搬运车 手动液压堆高车|半电动堆高车|电动堆高车|堆垛车 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架厂 货架厂 货架公司 货架公司 货架公司 托盘 钢托盘 铁托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 托盘 塑料托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 铁托盘 货架厂 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 折叠仓储笼 南京货架 货架公司 货架厂 仓库货架 仓储货架 货架 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架 货架厂 货架公司 南京货架 上海货架 托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 木托盘 南京托盘 南京钢托盘 上海托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 钢制料箱 手推车 静音手推车 平板手推车 登高车 物流台车 载物台车 置物架 堆垛架 巧固架 挂板架 物料整理架 手动液压托盘搬运车 叉车 登高车 堆垛车 货架 仓储货架 仓库货架 货架厂 货架公司 南京货架 上海货架 杭州货架 北京货架 托盘 钢托盘 钢制托盘 塑料托盘 木托盘 纸托盘 南京托盘 南京钢制托盘 南京钢托盘 上海托盘 北京托盘 仓储笼 仓库笼 折叠式仓储笼 南京仓储笼 上海仓储笼 钢制料箱 手推车 静音手推车 平板手推车 登高车 物流台车 置物架 堆垛架 巧固架 物料整理架 手动液压托盘搬运车 叉车 堆高车 堆垛车

8:38 AM, August 19, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home